ActuallyUses
Menu

What do creators use to track performance?

YouTube Studio is the most-adopted tool for this among creators we track, used by 14 creators (100% of its mentions organic over the past 90 days). This ranking counts real, receipt-backed creator usage — no editorial opinion, no paid placement.

Spans: 1 category · ranked by active tracked creators

Affiliate links · Werbung›

Affiliate disclosure: links marked with ↗ on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never influences rankings, trending scores or organic/sponsored labels — those are computed exclusively from creator-mention data.

Werbehinweis gemäß §5a UWG: Mit ↗ markierte Links auf dieser Seite sind Affiliate-Links (Werbung). Bei einem Kauf über diese Links erhalten wir eine Provision; für Sie entstehen keine Mehrkosten. Dies hat niemals Einfluss auf Rankings, Trend-Scores oder Organisch/Gesponsert-Kennzeichnungen — diese werden ausschließlich aus Creator-Erwähnungsdaten berechnet.

  1. 1
    YouTube StudioAnalytics & Performance

    YouTube's channel back office: uploads, audience and retention figures, comments and revenue.

    14 active creators · 55 mentions · 100% organic (past 90 days)

    “Then head over to YouTube Studio. Upload your video.” — Robert’s Tech Toolboxsource ↗

  2. 2
    vidIQAnalytics & Performance

    YouTube growth toolkit — keyword and SEO research, competitor tracking, daily ideas and channel analytics to grow views.

    10 active creators · 89 mentions · 92% organic (past 90 days) · Free; Pro from ~$7.50/mo

    “Get vidIQ to grow your channel faster! 🚀” — YouDontKnowItsource ↗

  3. 3
    PostHogAnalytics & Performance

    Product analytics with events, session replay, feature flags and experiments, self-hostable.

    7 active creators · 11 mentions · 64% organic (past 90 days)

    “Try PostHog yourself” — David Ondrejsource ↗

  4. 4
    TubeBuddyAnalytics & Performance

    Browser extension for YouTube creators — keyword tags, A/B thumbnail and title tests, bulk tools and channel analytics.

    5 active creators · 67 mentions · 36% organic (past 90 days) · Free; paid from ~$4.50/mo

    “Keyword research tool for YouTube (TubeBuddy)” — Modern Milliesource ↗

  5. 5
    Google AnalyticsAnalytics & Performance

    Google web and app analytics (GA4) — traffic, audience, acquisition and conversion reporting across your sites.

    2 active creators · 2 mentions · 100% organic (past 90 days) · Free (GA4)

  6. 6
    Fathom AnalyticsAnalytics & Performance

    Privacy-first website analytics — simple, fast and GDPR and cookie-law compliant, with no cookie banner required.

    1 active creators · 1 mentions · 100% organic (past 90 days) · From $15/mo

FAQ

What tool do most creators use to track performance?
YouTube Studio is the most-adopted tool for this job among the creators we track: 14 tracked creators have an active usage record for it. 100% of its classified mentions are organic, meaning no sponsorship signal was found in them (mentions we cannot classify are excluded from that ratio). Adoption counts, not editorial opinion, order this list, and the receipts behind it are linked above.
What is the runner-up to YouTube Studio, and when is it the better choice?
vidIQ is the runner-up with 10 active creators, against 14 for YouTube Studio, in the same category. We do not editorialize the gap. What the data offers: 92% of vidIQ's classified mentions are organic, versus 100% for YouTube Studio. Pricing: Free; Pro from ~$7.50/mo. Read the receipts on both tool pages and weigh the quotes yourself; that is what they are there for.
How is this ranking decided?
By counting creators, not opinions. Every mention we ingest carries a receipt: a source link, a timestamp or position, a verbatim quote of at most 120 characters, and a sponsorship classification (organic, sponsored or ambiguous). The list orders tools by how many tracked creators actively use each one; organic mentions weigh four times more than sponsored ones in scoring. Affiliate links on this page have no path into that computation. Full detail is on the methodology page.
How fresh is this data?
The scores behind this ranking are snapshotted weekly, and the data behind the current list was computed on 12 Oct 2026, the same date the stamp at the bottom of this page shows. After a recompute, the page refreshes within roughly ten to twenty minutes (two stacked 600-second caches). Recency also shapes the ranking itself: mention weight decays with a 14-day half-life, so current usage counts more than last year's.
Are these affiliate recommendations?
No. Some links on this page, marked with an arrow, are affiliate links, and if you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. That revenue has no path into the ranking: positions, trending scores and sponsorship labels are computed exclusively from creator-mention data. The full disclosure, in FTC wording and the German paragraph 5a UWG wording, sits on this page above the list.
Where do these creator mentions come from?
From public content by the creators we track: YouTube videos, podcast episodes, X posts and newsletters. When a tracked creator mentions a tool there, we ingest the mention together with its receipt: a source link, a timestamp or position, a quote of at most 120 characters, and a sponsorship classification. Rankings are computed exclusively from that mention data; money never changes them.
data updated